<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brand Identity: Start an Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/brand-identity-start-an-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/brand-identity-start-an-evolution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:46:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: giffie</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/brand-identity-start-an-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>giffie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/?p=395#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>The man of virtue makes the difficulty to be overcome his first business, and success only a subsequent consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The man of virtue makes the difficulty to be overcome his first business, and success only a subsequent consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The only way to brand recognition in the long term is maintaining consistency. &#124; tmd blog</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/brand-identity-start-an-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>The only way to brand recognition in the long term is maintaining consistency. &#124; tmd blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/?p=395#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/brand-identity-start-an-evolution/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/brand-identity-start-an-evolution/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/brand-identity-start-an-evolution/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Month In The Creative Community: An August Roundup &#124; Fuel Your Creativity</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/brand-identity-start-an-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>A Month In The Creative Community: An August Roundup &#124; Fuel Your Creativity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/?p=395#comment-251</guid>
		<description>[...] Brand Identity: Start an Evolution [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brand Identity: Start an Evolution [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew MacPherson</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/brand-identity-start-an-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew MacPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourbranding.com/?p=395#comment-195</guid>
		<description>This notion of incremental evolution is definitely relevant lately. Pizza Hut told us they were going to start referring to themselves as &quot;The Hut&quot; a month or two ago. More recently, Radio Shack told us they were going to refer to themselves as &quot;The Shack&quot;. I can&#039;t see the brilliance in gutting the key component of your brand in favor of, in these two examples, a literally empty shell.

Pizza Hut sells more than pizza. We all get that.

Radio Shack doesn&#039;t just sell radios. Okay, but their key category now is cell phones which are literally built upon... guess what? Radios.

I guess where this ties into what you said above is that you mentioned brand changes being driven by the external strategic or creative side. The business side needs to show restraint as well when declining market breeds enough desperation to dramatically revamp the brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This notion of incremental evolution is definitely relevant lately. Pizza Hut told us they were going to start referring to themselves as &#8220;The Hut&#8221; a month or two ago. More recently, Radio Shack told us they were going to refer to themselves as &#8220;The Shack&#8221;. I can&#8217;t see the brilliance in gutting the key component of your brand in favor of, in these two examples, a literally empty shell.</p>
<p>Pizza Hut sells more than pizza. We all get that.</p>
<p>Radio Shack doesn&#8217;t just sell radios. Okay, but their key category now is cell phones which are literally built upon&#8230; guess what? Radios.</p>
<p>I guess where this ties into what you said above is that you mentioned brand changes being driven by the external strategic or creative side. The business side needs to show restraint as well when declining market breeds enough desperation to dramatically revamp the brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
